In the recent Philips-sponsored Economist.com online debate, two globally recognized healthcare opinion leaders debated the following topic: should government play a stronger role in guiding consumer’s food and nutrition choices?

The discussion generated 165 comments throughout its duration from December 8-18th and, in the end, those in agreement with the idea that the government should play a stronger role in regulating food choices won 56% to 44%.

Kelly D. Brownell, Ph.D., Professor of Psychology, Epidemiology and Public Health, and Director, Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, Yale University defended larger governmental accountability by saying that, “Governments have a role to play in regulating marketing (particularly when vulnerable populations are targeted), reversing distorted economics whereby incentives now lead to heavy purchase of calorie-dense foods, making public institutions such as schools, hospitals and government facilities provide more nutritious food, and aligning trade and subsidy policies with health priorities.”

Melanie Leech, Director General of the Food and Drink Federation in the UK was against more government accountability, and closed her argument by saying that, “The best results will always come when governments work in genuine partnership with industry to educate individuals to be more aware of the impact of the choices they make in terms of both diet and exercise, for themselves, their families and, ultimately, society.”

Throughout the 10 day debate, guest speakers were invited to introduce their point of view, including Susan K Neely, President and CEO of the American Beverage Association. Neely agreed broadly with larger governmental accountability but clarified that a collective effort would be required from government, industry, health professionals, parents, and school leaders.

The Philips Perspective
Erik de Heus, spokesperson for debate sponsor Philips and CEO of the company’s New Wellness Solutions business, expressed that although the government has a vital role to play in educating consumers about what they are eating, ultimately it is about personal choice and responsibility. He explained that the everyday choices that people make for themselves can have the most impact, whether it’s choosing the low fat option, taking a brisk walk, cutting sugar from a diet, or going to the gym on a regular basis.

de Heus said, “Employers can also play a part by taking care of their workers.  There is recognition that healthy employees who feel good about themselves are more productive and contribute positively to the work environment. A growing number of companies are now taking an active role in disease management and health promotion, mainly through employee wellness programs, which is a great way of being part of the solution.”

Overall, this debate generated a provocative dialogue. It’s not too late to share your opinion. Post a comment on our blog or on the post-debate online discussion.

Tom